Case 4118357/2014 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4118357/2014 Mr W Webster v Richard Irvin Energy Solutions Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 4118357/2014
- Decision date
- 26 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4118357/2014 Mr W Webster
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal for Scotland, in case 4118357/2014, recorded that Mr W Webster's claim against Richard Irvin Energy Solutions Limited was struck out under Rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The stated ground was that the claim had not been actively pursued within Rule 37(1)(d).
The judgment does not set out any substantive determination of the underlying employment issues. It is a procedural disposal only, and the extracted text does not identify the precise claim type or any findings on liability, loss, or remedy.
The judgment is dated 29 October 2020 and was sent to the parties on the same date. No monetary award is recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states only that 'the claim' was struck out under Rule 37 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued under Rule 37(1)(d). The text supplied does not specify the underlying head or heads of claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.