Case 4118408/2018 · Employment Tribunal
(sitting alone) Linda Milroy v Lisa McCabe t/a Stardust Doggy Care — 2019
- Case reference
- 4118408/2018
- Decision date
- 12 February 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Michelle Sutherland
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
(sitting alone) Linda Milroy
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant worked for the respondent as a dog walker from 3 April 2017 to 30 June 2018, paid at £7.83 an hour for 35 hours a week and paid one month in arrears. The respondent gave one month’s notice of termination. The tribunal recorded that no evidence was led by either party and that the facts were agreed from the documents lodged and discussion at the hearing.
On those agreed facts, the tribunal found that the claimant did not receive wages of £1,187.55 gross due on 1 June 2018, wages of £1,187.55 gross due on 1 July 2018, or £493.29 gross in respect of 9 days of accrued but unused holiday. The tribunal referred to sections 13, 13A, 23, 27 and 230 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and to the Working Time Regulations 1998 in explaining that holiday pay counted as wages and that a deduction from wages is unauthorised unless required or authorised by statute, contract terms notified in writing, or the worker’s prior written consent.
The tribunal held that there was no written agreement or consent authorising the deductions and that the deductions were therefore not authorised or excluded. It upheld the complaint of unlawful deduction from wages and ordered the respondent to pay £2,868.39 gross, subject to tax and national insurance being deducted and remitted to HMRC.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The award covered unpaid wages due on 1 June 2018 and 1 July 2018, together with pay for 9 days of accrued but untaken holiday. | Upheld | — | £2,868 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,868
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
5 references- s.13 ERA 1996
- s.13A Working Time Regulations 1998
- s.23 ERA 1996
- s.27 ERA 1996
- s.230 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.