Case 4118806/2014 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4118806/2014 Mr A Smith v Quarriers — 2021
- Case reference
- 4118806/2014
- Decision date
- 29 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4118806/2014 Mr A Smith
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal for Scotland struck out Mr A Smith's claim against Quarriers under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The stated ground was that the claim had not been actively pursued within rule 37(1)(d).
The tribunal recorded that correspondence sent to the claimant at the address provided had been returned marked 'gone away'. No new address had been supplied by the claimant. The claimant's previous agents had withdrawn from acting for him and did not hold any address other than the one in the claim form.
In those circumstances, the tribunal concluded that the claim did not appear to be actively pursued and therefore struck it out. No substantive liability findings or monetary remedy were recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment strikes out the claim under rule 37(1)(d) because it had not been actively pursued. The underlying substantive claim type is not specified in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.