Case 4120172/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs ML MacInnes v Represented by: Mr L Kennedy - Advocate British Red Cross — 2018
- Case reference
- 4120172/2018
- Decision date
- 20 December 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robert Gall
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs ML MacInnes
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing in Glasgow on 11 December 2018 before Employment Judge Robert Gall. The claimant did not attend, and neither did Mr Watson, the solicitor who had handled presentation of the claim. The tribunal recorded that the first claim form had been presented in time but rejected because the ACAS Early Conciliation Certificate details had not been completed correctly; the claim was then re-presented a few days later, by which time it was accepted that it was out of time.
The tribunal concluded that it could not properly determine whether time should be extended without evidence from Mr Watson about the circumstances of presentation of the second claim. After discussion, and noting the respondents’ objection, the tribunal postponed the preliminary hearing. The purpose of the adjourned hearing, fixed for 7 January 2019, was to hear evidence and submissions on whether it was not reasonably practicable for the claim to be presented in time and whether the claim had then been presented within a reasonable time.
Because the need for evidence had only become clear at the hearing and the respondents had incurred cost and inconvenience in attending, the tribunal made an expenses order against the claimant under Rule 76(1)(c) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The sum ordered was £600. The judgment records that Mr Kennedy confirmed the claimant would not personally be asked to meet that sum, as it would be paid by Mr Watson or his firm.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Preliminary hearing only. The claimant accepted that the second claim form was presented out of time. No substantive unfair dismissal decision was made; the hearing was postponed to determine the time-bar issue. | Other | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £600
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- not reasonably practicable to present the claim in time
- presented within a reasonable time
- Rule 76(1)(c) Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.