Case 4120176/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs PC Vasquez Herrera v Represented by: Mr L Rusu Edinburgh Group Accommodation — 2019
- Case reference
- 4120176/2018
- Decision date
- 22 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Macleod
- Venue
- Edinburgh
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs PC Vasquez Herrera
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 1 October 2019 the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 15 October 2019, or to request a hearing to consider why the claim should not be struck out. The judgment records that the claimant did not provide an acceptable reason or request a hearing.
The tribunal therefore struck out the claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued within rule 37(1)(d). The judgment does not determine the merits of any underlying complaint and records no remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive heads of claim; it records only that 'the claim' was struck out under rule 37(1)(d) because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.