Case 4120182/2018 · Employment Tribunal
E.T. Z (WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4120182/2018 Held in Glasgow on November 2018 Employment Judge: J D Young (sitting alone) Miss Rachel Gormley v The Post Office Fellowship Of Remembrance CIC — 2018
- Case reference
- 4120182/2018
- Decision date
- 10 December 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge JD Young
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
E.T. Z (WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4120182/2018 Held in Glasgow on November 2018 Employment Judge: J D Young (sitting alone) Miss Rachel Gormley
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant presented a claim for holiday pay. The respondent disputed the amount sought, but during the hearing the parties discussed the matter and agreed that the respondent would pay £2,700 under deduction of tax and national insurance as may be due in full and final settlement of the claim.
The tribunal therefore issued a judgment by consent in those terms. The reasons note that no order was made about a reference which had been provided by the respondent, although the parties agreed that it might be adjusted by the respondent.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Consent judgment recorded after discussion at the hearing; the respondent agreed to pay the sum in full and final settlement of the holiday pay claim, under deduction of tax and national insurance as due. | Settled | — | £2,700 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,700
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.