Case 4120186/2018 · Employment Tribunal
(sitting alone) Miss V Kyriacou v Osman Celik — 2018
- Case reference
- 4120186/2018
- Decision date
- 5 December 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge David Hoey
- Venue
- Edinburgh
Parties
2 namedClaimant
(sitting alone) Miss V Kyriacou
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Miss V Kyriacou was employed by Osman Celik under a verbal contract at £7.38 an hour. It accepted her evidence that she worked a 2-hour trial shift on 14 May 2018 and then four shifts on 21, 22, 25 and 26 May 2018, totalling 25 hours and 10 minutes, and rejected the respondent's account that she had only been referred to another business. The tribunal preferred the claimant's evidence because it was clear and cogent, while the respondent's explanation was not credible and he produced no paperwork identifying any different employer.
After the claimant sent letters on 25 June 2018 and 2 August 2018 seeking payment for wages and holiday pay, and received no response, the tribunal held that the unpaid work and trial shift were properly payable under the verbal contract. It applied section 13 and section 23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and awarded £200.49 for 27 hours and 10 minutes at £7.38 per hour.
The tribunal also held that the claimant had accrued holiday entitlement for the period worked and had not taken any leave. Relying on Regulations 13, 13A and 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 and the ACAS holiday pay guidance, it calculated holiday pay at 12.07% of the gross wages and awarded £24.20. The sums were ordered to be paid as gross figures.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held the respondent was the claimant's employer, accepted the 2-hour trial shift and the later shifts as work under a verbal contract at £7.38 per hour, and awarded £200.49 for 27 hours and 10 minutes of unpaid wages. | Upheld | — | £200 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the claimant had accrued but untaken holiday entitlement and awarded £24.20, calculated as 12.07% of the gross wages. | Upheld | — | £24 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £225
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
4 references- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.23 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Regulations 13, 13A and 14 Working Time Regulations 1998
- ACAS holiday pay guidance
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.