Case 4120222/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4120222/2018 Mrs M Stewart v Clootie Dumpling Ltd T/a Taste — 2018
- Case reference
- 4120222/2018
- Decision date
- 22 November 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge S. MacLean Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4120222/2018 Mrs M Stewart
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a rule 21 judgment, with no response presented by the respondent, so the Employment Judge determined the claim on the available material. The tribunal found that Mrs M Stewart had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £2,013.48, stated to represent 7 weeks' net wages.
The tribunal also found that she was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £3,465, described as 10.5 weeks' gross wages. In addition, it found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,323.12 in respect of 23 days.
The judgment cancelled the hearing listed for 14 December 2018. The total monetary award on the face of the judgment was £6,801.60, made up of the three sums ordered in the individual findings.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Awarded damages for 7 weeks' net wages in respect of notice. | Upheld | — | £2,013 |
| Redundancy | Tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of 10.5 weeks' gross wages. | Upheld | — | £3,465 |
| Holiday pay | Tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement for 23 days. | Upheld | — | £1,323 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,802
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.