Case 4120357/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4120357/2018 Mr D Anderson v Matthew Cohen And Associates Limited — 2018
- Case reference
- 4120357/2018
- Decision date
- 14 November 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Robison Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4120357/2018 Mr D Anderson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a rule 21 judgment issued because no response had been presented. On the available material, the Employment Judge determined that Matthew Cohen And Associates Limited had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr Anderson’s wages, had dismissed him in breach of contract in respect of notice, and had failed to pay his holiday entitlement.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £3,840. | Upheld | — | £3,840 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £2,880 damages. | Upheld | — | £2,880 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and held that he was entitled to a redundancy payment of £4,320. | Upheld | — | £4,320 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £2,688. | Upheld | — | £2,688 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £13,728
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.