Case 4120358/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Laundry Scotland Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 4120358/2018
- Decision date
- 14 June 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge P O’Donnell
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant worked for the respondent as a delivery driver from 13 June 2018 until 27 June 2018. He was paid in cash on 22 June 2018 and again on 29 June 2018. The tribunal found that on neither occasion was he given any itemised pay statement before or at the time of payment, so the respondent failed to comply with section 8 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The claimant later received itemised pay statements at the end of January 2019. The tribunal found that those later statements contained the gross and net amounts and deductions required by section 8, and that there was no requirement for an employee number. The claimant also objected to the address shown and to National Insurance entries on the statements, but the tribunal said it had no power under section 11(3) to determine the accuracy of the figures shown, and no power under section 12 to order payment to HMRC.
The tribunal therefore made a declaration that the respondent failed to provide the claimant with an itemised pay statement as required by section 8 ERA 1996 when it paid him on 22 and 29 June 2018. The claim did not result in any monetary award. The tribunal also noted that the claimant raised a possible wage deduction issue at the hearing, but no amendment was made and that matter was not determined.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Complaint under section 8 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 that the respondent failed to provide an itemised pay statement when paying wages on 22 and 29 June 2018. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- section 8 ERA 1996
- section 11(3)(b) ERA 1996
- section 12(3) ERA 1996
- overriding objective
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.