Case 4120632/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Greater Pollok Enterprise Trust T/a Southside Daycare — 2019
- Case reference
- 4120632/2018
- Decision date
- 20 June 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Whitcombe
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the claimant's claim for unpaid holiday pay was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. No substantive finding was made on that claim beyond the withdrawal.
By consent, the claim for unpaid notice pay as damages for breach of contract succeeded. The tribunal awarded the claimant the agreed net sum of £987.23.
The unfair dismissal claim also succeeded. The tribunal awarded a basic award of £3,686.58. The judgment records that the claimant did not seek a compensatory award.
The tribunal noted that the Employment Protection (Recoupment of Jobseeker's Allowance and Income Support) Regulations 1996 did not apply.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the claim for unpaid holiday pay was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | By consent, the claim for unpaid notice pay as damages for breach of contract succeeded, with the claimant awarded the agreed net sum of £987.23. | Upheld | — | £987 |
| Unfair dismissal | The unfair dismissal claim succeeded. The claimant was awarded a basic award of £3,686.58 and did not seek a compensatory award. | Upheld | — | £3,687 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,674
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £3,687
- statutory, unfair dismissal
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.