Case 4120656/2018 · Employment Tribunal

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4120656/2018 Miss G MacKay v Represented by: Ms H Johnson Solicitor The City Of Edinburgh Council st and 2 others — 2019

Case reference: 4120656/2018
Decision date: 28 February 2019
Jurisdiction: Scotland
Judge: Employment Judge Murdo

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

4 named

Claimant

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4120656/2018 Miss G MacKay

Respondents

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal recorded that Miss G MacKay's claim against The City of Edinburgh Council, Tricia Bell and East Lothian Council had been withdrawn by the claimant. Employment Judge Murdo A Macleod therefore dismissed the claim under Rule 52 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.

No substantive findings on liability or remedy were recorded in the extracted judgment text, and no monetary award was made. The judgment is dated 25 February 2019 and was entered in the register on 28 February 2019.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Disability discrimination	The extracted judgment text does not set out the underlying allegation, but the case listing identifies disability discrimination. The judgment states that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under Rule 52.	Dismissed	Disability	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.