Case 4120664/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: S/4120664/2018 Mr C Kerr v GM Pub Limited — 2018
- Case reference
- 4120664/2018
- Decision date
- 13 November 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Doherty Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: S/4120664/2018 Mr C Kerr
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued because no response had been presented to the claim. On the available material, Employment Judge L Doherty determined the claim without a hearing or any respondent participation.
The tribunal found that Mr C Kerr was unlawfully dismissed by GM Pub Limited. The judgment does not set out any further findings on the circumstances of dismissal, any statutory test applied, or any separate analysis of liability beyond that conclusion.
The respondent was ordered to pay a monetary award of £7,518.50. The judgment does not break that sum down into basic award, compensatory award, interest, or any other component.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal stated that the claimant was unlawfully dismissed and ordered a monetary award of £7,518.50, but the text does not split the award by head of loss or give further reasoning. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,519
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.