Case 4120690/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Held at Aberdeen Case No: S/4120690/2018 Mr GM Lornie v Limited (in Liquidation) — 2018
- Case reference
- 4120690/2018
- Decision date
- 26 November 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Nicol Hosie
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Held at Aberdeen Case No: S/4120690/2018 Mr GM Lornie
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the claimant withdrew the claim. It does not set out any factual findings or reasoning on the merits of the underlying complaints.
Following the withdrawal, Employment Judge Nicol Hosie dismissed the claim under Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. No remedy or monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under Rule 52. The specific claim category is taken from the listing context rather than the judgment text itself. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment states that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under Rule 52. The specific claim category is taken from the listing context rather than the judgment text itself. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.