Case 4120724/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4120724/2018 Mrs H Muir v Represented by: Mr R Miller Falkirk Community Trust — 2019
- Case reference
- 4120724/2018
- Decision date
- 22 February 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Porter Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4120724/2018 Mrs H Muir
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the claimant's age discrimination/victimisation complaint (DAG) and breach of contract complaint (BOC) had been withdrawn by the claimant. No merits findings are made in the judgment.
Because the complaints had been withdrawn, Employment Judge J Porter dismissed them under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The judgment does not record any liability findings, legal analysis on the merits, or any award of compensation.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The judgment refers to the complaint as 'discrimination or victimisation on the grounds of age (DAG)'; it records that the complaint had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under Rule 52. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment records that the breach of contract complaint (BOC) had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under Rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.