Case 4120804/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4120804/2018 Miss L McCorkindale v Gordon Brown T/A Bar Grill — 2018
- Case reference
- 4120804/2018
- Decision date
- 13 November 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Robison Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4120804/2018 Miss L McCorkindale
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was dealt with under rule 21 because no response had been presented. On the available material, Employment Judge M Robison found that Miss L McCorkindale had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. The tribunal ordered Gordon Brown T/A 55 Bar Grill to pay damages of £334.73 for that claim.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £464.03. The listed hearing on 12 December 2018 was cancelled. The judgment does not set out any additional reasoning beyond the rule 21 disposal and the two monetary awards.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £334.73. | Upheld | — | £335 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £464.03. | Upheld | — | £464 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £799
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.