Case 4121030/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4121030/2018 Mrs L Walker v Pacific Care No.1 Limited (In Liquidation) — 2019
- Case reference
- 4121030/2018
- Decision date
- 26 April 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4121030/2018 Mrs L Walker
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs L Walker’s complaint of unfair dismissal succeeded. The respondent, Pacific Care No.1 Limited (in liquidation), did not enter a response, and the liquidator consented to the claim proceeding. The Employment Judge therefore determined liability on the available material without a hearing under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The judgment records a total award of £6,606.11, as set out in the claimant’s schedule of loss. The basic award was £4,536.76, calculated by reference to the claimant’s age and length of service, and the compensatory award was £2,067.35. That compensatory award included £350 for loss of statutory rights.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The claim was determined under Rule 21 after the respondent failed to lodge an ET3. The liquidator consented to the claim proceeding and the Employment Judge decided liability could properly be determined without a hearing. | Upheld | — | £6,606 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,606
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £4,537
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £2,067
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.