Case 4121039/2018 · Employment Tribunal
ETZ 4(WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4121039/2018 Hearing at Edinburgh on March 2019 Employment Judge: M A Macleod (sitting alone) Serge Cornu v The Edinburgh Woollen Mill (Group) Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 4121039/2018
- Decision date
- 29 March 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Murdo
Parties
2 namedClaimant
ETZ 4(WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4121039/2018 Hearing at Edinburgh on March 2019 Employment Judge: M A Macleod (sitting alone) Serge Cornu
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Cornu remained employed by The Edinburgh Woollen Mill Limited as a store supervisor. His unlawful deduction from wages claim concerned April and May 2018, when his hourly rate increased to the National Minimum Wage rate of £7.83 but did not include the additional 20p per hour supervisor premium that had been paid in previous years. From June 2018 his rate was increased to £8.03 per hour, representing the minimum wage plus 20p.
The Tribunal accepted that the applicable standard contract provided that rates of pay were normally reviewed in October and that there was no contractual right to any increase following a review. Mr Cornu argued that a term should be implied by custom and practice requiring payment of the National Minimum Wage plus 20p per hour. The respondent denied that the contract contained or implied such an entitlement.
Applying the custom and practice authorities referred to in the judgment, the Tribunal found that Mr Cornu had not proved a reasonable, notorious and certain contractual term. The previous premium had not always been the same, because it had been 26p before being reduced to 20p, and Mr Cornu's evidence indicated that a smaller differential would have satisfied his wish for supervisor pay to remain above sales assistant pay. The Tribunal also found that the express contract reserved pay increases to review and did not guarantee them, and that the respondent's practice was explicable as discretionary rather than legally obligatory.
The Tribunal concluded that Mr Cornu had no contractual or legal entitlement to be paid £8.03 per hour in April and May 2018. His right was to have pay reviewed with no guarantee of an increase, and the respondent had met its legal obligation by paying the National Minimum Wage. The unlawful deduction from wages claim therefore failed and was dismissed, with no monetary award recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim concerned an alleged failure to pay a 20p per hour supervisor premium for April and May 2018. The Tribunal found no contractual entitlement to that premium for those months. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- reasonable, notorious and certain
- Albion Automotive Ltd v Walker [2002] EWCA Civ 946
- Park Cakes Ltd v Shumba [2013] IRLR 800
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.