Case 4121087/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4121087/2018, 4112983/2018, 4112987/2018, 4120638/2018 Mrs R Gaziova v Cordia Services LLP — 2023
- Case reference
- 4121087/2018
- Decision date
- 16 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4121087/2018, 4112983/2018, 4112987/2018, 4120638/2018 Mrs R Gaziova
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claims under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure on the ground that they had not been actively pursued, in terms of rule 37(1)(d).
The Tribunal recorded that on 13 July 2023 the claimant was given an opportunity to provide written reasons by 3 August 2023, or to request a hearing, to explain why the claims should not be struck out. The claimant did not give an acceptable reason why judgment should not be made and did not request a hearing. The claims were therefore struck out.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The judgment strikes out the claims for not being actively pursued. The judgment text does not set out the underlying equal pay issues, but the gov.uk listing category identifies the matter as Equal Pay Act. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.