Case 4121195/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4121195/2018 & 4121142/2018 Ms N Calvert v Glasgow City Council — 2023
- Case reference
- 4121195/2018
- Decision date
- 22 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4121195/2018 & 4121142/2018 Ms N Calvert
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claims under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure on the ground that they had not been actively pursued, specifically under rule 37(1)(d).
The claimant's solicitors had withdrawn from acting. After the claimant failed to respond to a status enquiry about whether she intended to pursue the claims, the Tribunal sent a strike out warning letter on 12 June 2023. That correspondence was returned because the claimant no longer lived at the address on the ET1, and she had not provided a new address.
The Tribunal stated that, without a current address, it could not communicate with the claimant or give notice under rule 37(2). It assumed that she no longer wished to pursue the claims and struck them out.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The gov.uk listing categorises the case under the Equal Pay Act; the judgment itself refers only to "the claims" and strikes them out under rule 37(1)(d) for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- rule 37
- rule 37(1)(d)
- rule 37(2)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.