Case 4121217/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4121217/2018 Mr J Bates v Stuart Bisset — 2018
- Case reference
- 4121217/2018
- Decision date
- 20 November 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge S MacLean Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4121217/2018 Mr J Bates
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment after the respondent failed to enter a response within the required time. The tribunal noted that the claim form had been sent to the respondent on 11 October 2018 and that no response was lodged. On the material available, the Employment Judge decided the case could properly be determined without a hearing on liability, but not on remedy.
The judgment records that the claimant's complaint of arrears of pay succeeds. No further findings of fact about the underlying pay dispute are set out in the judgment text provided, and no discrimination or dismissal issues are identified.
The tribunal did not determine remedy in this judgment. It stated that the remedy to which the claimant is entitled would be determined by an Employment Judge at a later hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 default judgment. The tribunal held that the claimant's complaint of arrears of pay succeeded, but remedy was not determined and was to be fixed at a later hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.