Case 4121228/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4121228/2018 Miss R Clunas v Ltd (In Liquidation) — 2019
- Case reference
- 4121228/2018
- Decision date
- 16 April 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alexander Kemp
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4121228/2018 Miss R Clunas
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Miss R Clunas brought a claim against Uniconn (Scotland) Ltd. The claimant was represented by Ms J Redpath, solicitor, and the respondent was represented by Mr G Clark, solicitor.
The tribunal stated that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant. It therefore dismissed the claim under Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. No findings on the merits or remedy were recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states only that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under Rule 52. It does not identify the substantive claim type in the extracted judgment text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.