Case 4121231/2018 · Employment Tribunal
A Kemp (sitting alone) Mr W Hassan v Balfour Beatty Group Employment Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 4121231/2018
- Decision date
- 30 January 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mr
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
A Kemp (sitting alone) Mr W Hassan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was dismissed for redundancy on 1 June 2018 and received pay in lieu of notice. The respondent confirmed the dismissal by letter dated 5 June 2018. The Tribunal held that, for the purposes of the unfair dismissal time limit under section 111 Employment Rights Act 1996, the effective date of termination was 1 June 2018 and was not postponed by the statutory notice provisions in section 97(2).
The claimant learned in July 2018 that another person may have been appointed to perform some of his former duties under a different job title. He had also been told by his union about the time limit for bringing a Tribunal claim. He pursued enquiries and later submitted an appeal, but did not start ACAS early conciliation until 8 October 2018 and presented the claim on 9 October 2018.
The Tribunal found that it had been reasonably practicable for the claimant to present the claim in time. It also found that the claim had not been presented within a reasonable period after he could have done so. The Tribunal therefore held that the claim was out of time, that it had no jurisdiction to consider it, and granted the respondent's application for strike out.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The claim was struck out because the Tribunal held it did not have jurisdiction: it was presented out of time under section 111(2) Employment Rights Act 1996 and the claimant had not shown that timely presentation was not reasonably practicable. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
10 references- section 111(2) Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 97 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 86 Employment Rights Act 1996
- reasonably practicable
- Palmer and Saunders v Southend on Sea Borough Council
- Asda Stores Ltd v Kauser
- Schultz v Esso Petroleum Company
- Northamptonshire County Council v Entwistle
- Porter v Bandridge Ltd
- Duniec v Travis Perkins Trading Co Limited
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.