Case 4121240/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4121240/2018 Miss N Nasibi v Alessandro Di Santo — 2018
- Case reference
- 4121240/2018
- Decision date
- 22 November 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M. Whitcombe Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4121240/2018 Miss N Nasibi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, and Employment Judge M. Whitcombe issued a judgment on the available material under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013. The tribunal found that the respondent, Alessandro Di Santo, had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £464.94. The judgment also records that the hearing listed for 3 January 2019 was cancelled. No further findings, legal tests, or split of the award into separate remedy components were set out in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | No response was presented. The tribunal issued a Rule 21 judgment on the available material and found an unauthorised deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £465 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £465
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.