Case 4121330/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4121330/2018 Mr J Hope v Represented by: Mr R Lawson, Solicitor Fuel Transport Solutions Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 4121330/2018
- Decision date
- 17 January 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jane Porter
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4121330/2018 Mr J Hope
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Mr J Hope's claim against Fuel Transport Solutions Limited had been withdrawn by the claimant. The Employment Tribunal therefore dismissed the claim under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The extracted text does not set out any findings on the merits, any factual dispute, or any remedy. It is a short disposal judgment only. The judgment is dated 17 January 2019 and was entered in the register on the same date by Employment Judge Jane Porter.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records only that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under Rule 52; it does not separate the heads of claim in the extracted text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment records only that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under Rule 52; it does not separate the heads of claim in the extracted text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.