Case 4121412/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4121412/2018 Mr S Addis v Tracpac Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 4121412/2018
- Decision date
- 11 January 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mark Whitcombe
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4121412/2018 Mr S Addis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment on the available material because no response had been presented by the respondent. Employment Judge Mark Whitcombe determined the claim without a hearing and cancelled the hearing listed for 1 February 2019.
The tribunal found that Tracpac Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr S Addis’s wages and ordered payment of £276.15. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £750.00.
No other claims or remedy elements were identified in the judgment, and no findings were recorded on unfair dismissal or discrimination. The total monetary award shown by the two orders is £1,026.15.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £276.15 for an unauthorised deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £276 |
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £750.00 for failed holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £750 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,026
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.