Case 4121517/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4121517/2018 Mr P McMahon v Represented by: Ms L Beedie - First Employment Law Total E&P North Sea UK Limited st and 1 other — 2019
- Case reference
- 4121517/2018
- Decision date
- 22 May 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge James Hendry
Parties
3 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4121517/2018 Mr P McMahon
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr P McMahon brought a claim against Total E&P North Sea UK Limited and Total E & P UK Limited. The judgment does not identify the substantive claim type or set out any findings on the merits.
The tribunal recorded that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant. It therefore dismissed the claim under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
No remedy was awarded and the judgment contains no findings on liability, compensation, or other substantive issues.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. No substantive merits finding is made. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.