Case 4121607/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4121607/2018 Mr P Singh v Stockbridge Indian Ltd and 1 other — 2018
- Case reference
- 4121607/2018
- Decision date
- 7 December 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Doherty
Parties
3 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4121607/2018 Mr P Singh
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe extracted judgment is a short disposal. It records that the claimant withdrew the claim and that it was dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 on 7 December 2018 before Employment Judge Doherty.
No substantive findings are made on the underlying employment issues, and the text records no liability findings or monetary award. The judgment names Stockbridge Indian Ltd and Jackir Hussain as respondents.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The extracted judgment states that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under Rule 52. The text does not separately identify or dispose of the listed wage and working-time components. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The extracted judgment states that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under Rule 52. The text does not separately identify or dispose of the listed wage and working-time components. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.