Case 4121642/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4121642/2018 Mrs C Somerville v Glasgow City Council — 2024
- Case reference
- 4121642/2018
- Decision date
- 22 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge F Eccles Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4121642/2018 Mrs C Somerville
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, on the ground that it had not been actively pursued in terms of rule 37(1)(d).
The Tribunal had given the claimant an opportunity, by 11 June 2024, to provide written reasons or request a hearing to address why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason or request a hearing, and the claim was therefore struck out.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The gov.uk listing categories identify Equal Pay Act, but the judgment itself refers only to the claim being struck out under rule 37(1)(d). | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The gov.uk listing categories identify Working Time Regulations, but the judgment itself refers only to the claim being struck out under rule 37(1)(d). | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.