Case 4121653/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4121653/2018 Mr N Lambert v Urquhart And Co (PHE) Limited (in Liquidation) — 2019
- Case reference
- 4121653/2018
- Decision date
- 25 March 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Walker
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4121653/2018 Mr N Lambert
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claims, and Employment Judge Walker issued judgment on the available material under rule 21. The judgment records that the respondent, Urquhart & Co (PHE) Limited (in liquidation), failed to comply with its obligations under section 188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992.
The tribunal therefore made a protective award under section 189 of that Act in favour of the claimants. The award period was 90 days starting on 25 September 2018.
The extracted text does not state a monetary sum for the award, and no separate remedy breakdown is given in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to comply with its obligations under section 188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 and made a protective award under section 189 for a period of 90 days starting on 25 September 2018. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 21
- section 188A TULRCA 1992
- section 189 TULRCA 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.