Case 4121683/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4121683/2018 Mr D Lithgow v ACS Aviation Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 4121683/2018
- Decision date
- 2 May 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Murdo
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4121683/2018 Mr D Lithgow
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal record states that Mr D Lithgow's claim against ACS Aviation Ltd had been withdrawn by the claimant. The judgment therefore records no findings on the underlying merits of any pleaded complaint.
The tribunal dismissed the claim under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. No remedy was awarded and no liability findings were made.
The judgment is a short disposal order only. It identifies Employment Judge Murdo A Macleod, with the judgment dated 1 May 2019 and entered in the register on 2 May 2019.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.