Mr Damien Fleming v Hula Bar — 2018

Case reference: 4121808/2018
Decision date: 4 December 2018
Jurisdiction: Scotland
Judge: Employment Judge Ian McPherson

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr Damien Fleming

Respondent

Hula Bar

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

This was a Rule 21 judgment in which no response had been presented by Hula Bar. On the available material, Employment Judge Ian McPherson found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr Damien Fleming’s wages. The judgment ordered the respondent to pay £716.45, said to represent 91.5 hours at £7.82 per hour.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unlawful deduction from wages	Rule 21 judgment on the available material; the respondent presented no response. The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £716.45, described as 91.5 hours at £7.82 per hour.	Upheld	—	£716

Remedy

Monetary award

Total award: £716; across all upheld claims

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.