Case 4121836/2018 · Employment Tribunal

69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4121836/2018 Mrs S C Raikes v Represented by: Mr G N Raikes- Husband WM Morrison Supermarkets plc — 2019

Case reference: 4121836/2018
Decision date: 2 April 2019
Jurisdiction: Scotland
Judge: Employment Judge Alexander Kemp

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4121836/2018 Mrs S C Raikes

Respondent

Represented by: Mr G N Raikes- Husband WM Morrison Supermarkets plc

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The judgment records that Mrs S C Raikes brought a claim against WM Morrison Supermarkets Plc and that the claim was withdrawn by the claimant. Employment Judge Alexander Kemp therefore dismissed the claim under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.

The extracted text contains no substantive findings on the pleaded issues, no evidence summary, and no award of compensation. The decision is dated 2 April 2019, and the entry notes that it was copied to the parties on the same date.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Race discrimination	The judgment states that the claim was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52. The extracted text records no substantive findings on liability or remedy.	Withdrawn	Race	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.