Case 4121856/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4121856/2018 Mr R Maclennan v Urquhart And Co (PHE) Limited (in Liquidation) — 2019
- Case reference
- 4121856/2018
- Decision date
- 25 March 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Walker
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4121856/2018 Mr R Maclennan
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response had been presented to the claim, and the tribunal proceeded on the available material under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013. Employment Judge Walker declared that Urquhart & Co (PHE) Limited (in liquidation) had failed to comply with its obligations under section 188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992.
The tribunal made a protective award under section 189 of that Act in favour of the claimants for a period of 90 days starting on 25 September 2018. The judgment records the declaration and the length and start date of the protective award, but does not set out a monetary figure in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal declared that the respondent failed to comply with section 188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 and made a protective award under section 189. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
- section 188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.