Case 4121866/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Mr P Sinclair (Case No: 4121866/2018) st v Represented by: Mr D Hutchison, Solicitor Amey Services Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 4121866/2018
- Decision date
- 27 March 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Murdo
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Mr P Sinclair (Case No: 4121866/2018) st
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe extract lists Mr P Sinclair, Mr M Donaldson and Mr K Sharp as claimants against Amey Services Limited. It records that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant and was dismissed under Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The judgment is a short disposal order rather than a merits decision. It gives no findings on liability, no reasoning on the underlying claims, and no monetary award. The judgment date is 22 March 2019 and it was entered in the register on 27 March 2019.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The PDF itself only records that the claim was withdrawn and dismissed under Rule 52; the substantive head of claim is taken from the case listing. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The PDF itself only records that the claim was withdrawn and dismissed under Rule 52; the substantive head of claim is taken from the case listing. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.