Case 4121933/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T McAlpine v Litigant in person Sodexo Justice Services (Sodexo Limited) — 2019
- Case reference
- 4121933/2018
- Decision date
- 18 June 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sally Cowen
- Venue
- Edinburgh
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T McAlpine
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr T McAlpine was employed from 24 November 2008 as a Prisoner Custody Officer and later promoted to Senior Prison Custody Officer at HMP Addiewell. The respondent suspended him on 1 June 2018 after an anonymous intelligence report alleged that he had posted racist comments on Facebook on 29 May 2018. The claimant said the comments were quotations from Tommy Robinson and asserted that the screenshots relied on by the respondent had been altered, but he was unable to explain the differences between the screenshot versions or identify where the quotations had come from.
The tribunal found that the respondent carried out a reasonable investigation through Mr McClure, Mrs Anderson and Mr Whitehead, including interviews, consideration of the screenshot versions, metadata analysis and other IT testing. It accepted that Mrs Anderson genuinely believed the claimant had written the comments himself and that the claimant had not shown that the comments were clearly identified as quotations. The tribunal also found that Mr Whitehead reasonably concluded that further technical investigation would not change the question of whether the words used were offensive.
Applying s.98 ERA 1996, BHS v Burchell, Iceland Frozen Foods v Jones and the ACAS Code, the tribunal held that the reason for dismissal was misconduct, which was a fair reason, that a fair procedure had been followed, and that dismissal fell within the band of reasonable responses. It also rejected the claimant's complaint that the penalty was disproportionate by reference to another officer's case, finding the matters sufficiently different. The unfair dismissal claim was therefore dismissed and no award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the dismissal fair and dismissed the unfair dismissal complaint. No monetary award was made. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
7 references- s.98 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.98(2)(b) ERA 1996
- s.98(4) ERA 1996
- BHS v Burchell
- ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary & Grievance Procedures
- Iceland Frozen Foods v Jones
- band of reasonable responses
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.