Case 4121952/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4121952/2018 Mr Iain Cackette v Pirie And Smith Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 4121952/2018
- Decision date
- 10 January 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4121952/2018 Mr Iain Cackette
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued on the available material because no response had been presented by the respondent. Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman determined that Pirie And Smith Limited had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr Iain Cackette's wages and ordered payment of £1,315.00 in respect of 20 days' pay.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in relation to notice, and awarded damages of £394.50. In addition, it held that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered a further £394.50. The listed hearing on 24 January 2019 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment; no response was presented. Tribunal ordered payment of £1,315.00 in respect of 20 days' pay. | Upheld | — | £1,315 |
| Breach of contract | Claim succeeded in respect of notice pay. Tribunal awarded damages of £394.50. | Upheld | — | £395 |
| Holiday pay | Tribunal found the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and awarded £394.50. | Upheld | — | £395 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,104
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.