Case 4122120/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4122120/2018 Miss C Halliday v Glasgow City Council — 2023
- Case reference
- 4122120/2018
- Decision date
- 16 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Number: 4122120/2018 Miss C Halliday
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure on the ground that it had not been actively pursued.
The judgment records that the claimant's solicitors had withdrawn, and that correspondence sent on 24 May 2023 asking the claimant to confirm her intentions was returned because she no longer lived at the address given on the ET1. The claimant had not provided a new address, so the tribunal could not communicate with her or give notice under rule 37(2).
In those circumstances, the tribunal assumed the claimant no longer wished to pursue the claim and struck it out under rule 37(1)(d). No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment struck out the claim for not being actively pursued under rule 37(1)(d). The judgment does not identify the substantive causes of action, although the gov.uk listing categories refer to Equal Pay Act and Working Time Regulations. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37(1)(d) Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- rule 37(2) Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.