Case 4122123/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Howie v RBG Security Solutions Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 4122123/2018
- Decision date
- 24 January 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge F Jane Garvie
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Howie
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss A Howie presented a claim for unpaid wages. Although the ET1 had originally named RBG Security Solutions Ltd, the hearing established that the correct respondent was Secura Scotland Ltd, which the tribunal added as a second respondent. The first respondent was dismissed from the claim.
The tribunal found that the claimant worked three shifts for the second respondent on 4, 9 and 18 August 2018. The dispute was over the rate and hours payable. The claimant said she should be paid at £8.75 per hour as an SIA steward and claimed 15 hours, while Mr Mabon said she was working as a Safety Steward, which was an unlicensed role paid at £7.83 per hour, and that she had worked 13.5 hours.
The tribunal accepted that the claimant's SIA licence had expired in May 2018 and had not been renewed. It concluded that she was therefore entitled to the Safety Steward rate of £7.83 per hour, and not the higher SIA steward rate. On the hours worked, the tribunal preferred Mr Mabon's evidence, supported by the invoices he produced, and found that the claimant had worked 13.5 hours in total.
On that basis, the tribunal held that the second respondent owed the claimant £105.70 in outstanding wages and ordered payment of that sum. The tribunal noted that any reason advanced for withholding payment, including the claimant's social media posts, was not a lawful basis for refusing to pay wages earned.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the claimant had been underpaid by the second respondent and ordered payment of £105.70. The claim insofar as it was directed against the first respondent was dismissed after the tribunal accepted that Secura Scotland Ltd was the correct contracting respondent. | Upheld | — | £106 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £106
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.