Case 4122290/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Ms F Campbell v Lloyds pharmacy — 2019
- Case reference
- 4122290/2018
- Decision date
- 12 March 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shona MacLean
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms F Campbell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt with a preliminary issue on time limits rather than the merits of the dismissal. It was agreed that the claimant’s effective date of termination was 18 May 2018 and that her unfair dismissal claim, presented on 1 November 2018, was out of time unless the tribunal extended time under section 111 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The claimant had multiple contacts with Citizens Advice both before and after dismissal and pursued an internal appeal. The tribunal accepted that 2018 had been a traumatic year for her and that she believed she had to exhaust the appeal process before bringing a tribunal claim. However, it was not satisfied that she had in fact been given incorrect advice about time limits, and considered it highly unlikely that all four CAB advisers failed to mention them. Given her repeated CAB meetings and her ability to access information online, the tribunal found that it was reasonably practicable for her to have presented the claim before 17 August 2018.
The tribunal also held that, even if it had not been reasonably practicable to present the claim in time, the claim was not brought within a further reasonable period. By 17 October 2018 the claimant knew the claim was out of time, but she did not contact ACAS until 26 October 2018. The tribunal concluded that it therefore had no jurisdiction to hear the unfair dismissal complaint.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held it had no jurisdiction to hear the unfair dismissal complaint because it was presented out of time and no extension was granted. The merits of the dismissal were not determined. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 111 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 207B Employment Rights Act 1996
- not reasonably practicable test
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.