Case 4122588/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4122588/2018 Mr R Da Maia v Max Renewables Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 4122588/2018
- Decision date
- 11 January 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4122588/2018 Mr R Da Maia
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued because no response had been presented to the claim. On the available material, Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman determined that Mr R Da Maia had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. The tribunal ordered Max Renewables Ltd to pay damages of £2,340 for that breach.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £2,032. The hearing listed for 23 January 2019 was cancelled. The judgment does not record any further reasoning, and no discrimination or other statutory claims are set out in the text provided.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £2,340. | Upheld | — | £2,340 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and held that he was entitled to a redundancy payment of £2,032. | Upheld | — | £2,032 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,372
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.