Case 4122648/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Ms B Savage v Represented by :- Ashdene Management Services Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 4122648/2018
- Decision date
- 4 February 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Kemp
- Venue
- Dundee
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms B Savage
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued within rule 37(1)(d). The judgment records that the claimant was given an opportunity on 25 January 2019 to provide written reasons by 1 February 2019 or to request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out.
The claimant did not give an acceptable reason why the claim should not be struck out and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge A Kemp made the strike-out order on 4 February 2019. No remedy, compensation, or award was made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The judgment’s reasons do not separately identify the pleaded claims; this classification follows the case listing context, which recorded age discrimination as one of the case categories. The strike-out applied to the claim as a whole under rule 37. | Struck out | Age | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment’s reasons do not separately identify the pleaded claims; this classification follows the case listing context, which recorded unfair dismissal as one of the case categories. The strike-out applied to the claim as a whole under rule 37. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.