Case 4122676/2018 · Employment Tribunal
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No 4122676/2018 Mr G Campbell v Represented by: Fiona Meek Solicitor University Of Dundee — 2019
- Case reference
- 4122676/2018
- Decision date
- 17 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ian Mcfatridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
69(scot) claim dismissed on withdrawal rule EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No 4122676/2018 Mr G Campbell
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal record for Mr G Campbell v University of Dundee states that the claim was withdrawn by the claimant. The judgment does not set out the substantive complaint, but the supplied case listing identifies the matter as disability discrimination.
Employment Judge Ian Mcfatridge therefore dismissed the claim under Rule 52 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The judgment records no liability findings and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records only that the claimant withdrew the claim and that it was dismissed under Rule 52. The supplied case listing identifies the matter as disability discrimination; the judgment itself does not set out the underlying factual allegations. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.