Case 4122971/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4122971/2018 Held in Aberdeen on July 2019 Employment Judge N M Hosie Mr T Frizzel v Prosafe Offshore Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 4122971/2018
- Decision date
- 18 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Nicol Hosie
- Venue
- Aberdeen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4122971/2018 Held in Aberdeen on July 2019 Employment Judge N M Hosie Mr T Frizzel
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 1 July 2019 the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 8 July 2019, or to request a hearing, to explain why the claim should not be struck out. The judgment records that the claimant did not provide an acceptable reason and did not request a hearing.
The tribunal therefore struck out the claim under Rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, relying on Rule 37(1)(d) on the basis that the claim had not been actively pursued. The judgment does not record any substantive determination of the underlying merits and does not award any remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive cause or causes of action. It records only that the claim was struck out under Rule 37 on the basis that it had not been actively pursued in terms of Rule 37(1)(d). | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 37
- Rule 37(1)(d)
- not actively pursued
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.