Case 4122997/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Lupu v Represented by: Ms S Muir - Solicitor Fast Despatch Transport Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 4122997/2018
- Decision date
- 4 February 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mel Sangster
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Lupu
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Glasgow hearing on 30 January 2019, Employment Judge Mel Sangster considered the respondent Fast Despatch Transport Limited's application for an extension of time to present its ET3. The tribunal granted the application under Rule 20 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The response was therefore accepted by the tribunal and the case was allowed to proceed as defended. Oral reasons were given at the hearing, and the judgment was dated 2 February 2019 and entered in the register and copied to the parties on 4 February 2019.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment decided the respondent's application for an extension of time to present its ET3 under Rule 20 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The extension was granted and the response was accepted. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 20 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.