Case 4123036/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4123036/2018 Mr S Clement v Certus Inspection Services Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 4123036/2018
- Decision date
- 29 January 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Laura Doherty
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4123036/2018 Mr S Clement
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a rule 21 judgment in which no response had been presented by the respondent, Certus Inspection Services Ltd, and the Employment Judge determined the claim on the available material. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages. It ordered the respondent to pay £3,020 in respect of that unlawful deduction.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract. It ordered the respondent to pay damages of £1,597.59 for that claim. The hearing listed for 30 January 2019 was cancelled. The judgment does not record any discrimination, unfair dismissal, or other statutory claim, and it does not identify any separate remedy breakdown beyond the two sums awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £3,020. | Upheld | — | £3,020 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract and awarded damages of £1,597.59. | Upheld | — | £1,598 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,618
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.