Case 4123042/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4123042/2018 Mrs H Davidson v Jacks Ellon Limited st and 2 others — 2019
- Case reference
- 4123042/2018
- Decision date
- 4 March 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge NM Hosie
Parties
4 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4123042/2018 Mrs H Davidson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs H Davidson brought proceedings against Jacks Ellon Limited, Jack’s Steakhouse and Grill, and Chris Farman. The judgment records that the claim had been withdrawn by the claimant.
Because the claim was withdrawn, the Employment Tribunal dismissed it under Rule 52 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The judgment does not record any substantive findings on the underlying merits of the employment dispute.
No remedy, liability finding, or award is recorded in the judgment. The only dated administrative entries are the judgment date of 28 February 2019 and the register entry date of 04 March 2019.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The claim was withdrawn by the claimant and the tribunal dismissed it under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.