Case 4123236/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4123236/2018 Mr C Hill v Seriously Good Venison Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 4123236/2018
- Decision date
- 7 January 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Robison Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4123236/2018 Mr C Hill
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, and the Employment Judge issued a Rule 21 judgment on the available material. The tribunal found that Mr C Hill had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and that he was entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,266.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,088. The hearing listed for 1 March 2019 was cancelled. The judgment records no other substantive findings or separate remedy breakdown beyond those two sums.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Rule 21 judgment on available material; tribunal held the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £1,266 |
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 judgment on available material; tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £1,088 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,354
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.