Case 4123300/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4123300/2018 Mrs K Kolodziej v Huber& Richardson — 2019
- Case reference
- 4123300/2018
- Decision date
- 7 February 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4123300/2018 Mrs K Kolodziej
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe only extracted substantive finding is procedural. Mrs K Kolodziej withdrew the claim, and Employment Judge Eccles recorded that the claim was dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The judgment does not set out any contested factual findings, liability reasoning, or remedy because no substantive hearing outcome is recorded in the extracted text.
The case details identify the respondent as Huber and Richardson Limited and the decision date as 7 February 2019. On the extracted text alone, there is no indication of any award or settlement, and no panel members are listed, consistent with a judge-alone disposal.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not identify the substantive claim in the extracted text; the case listing is for unlawful deduction from wages. The claim was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.