Case 4123306/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Nos: 4123306/2018, 4123307/2018 & 4123308/2018 Mr A Beattie st v Represented by: Mr P Lefevre – Quantum Claims The British Red Cross Society st and 1 other — 2019
- Case reference
- 4123306/2018
- Decision date
- 8 April 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Nicol Hosie
Parties
3 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case Nos: 4123306/2018, 4123307/2018 & 4123308/2018 Mr A Beattie st
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis joined judgment covers case numbers 4123306/2018, 4123307/2018 and 4123308/2018. Employment Judge Nicol Hosie recorded that the claims had been withdrawn by the claimants and therefore dismissed them under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The judgment does not contain any findings on the merits of the underlying claims. It records no liability findings, no factual resolution of the dispute, and no remedy award.
The only substantive procedural outcome recorded is dismissal following withdrawal. The judgment was dated 5 April 2019 and entered in the register on 8 April 2019.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment records that the claims had been withdrawn by the claimants and were dismissed under Rule 52; it does not set out a separate merits finding for this head. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the claims had been withdrawn by the claimants and were dismissed under Rule 52; it does not set out a separate merits finding for this head. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that the claims had been withdrawn by the claimants and were dismissed under Rule 52; it does not set out a separate merits finding for this head. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment records that the claims had been withdrawn by the claimants and were dismissed under Rule 52; it does not set out a separate merits finding for this head. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.